SEC Highlights Compliance Issues Related to Suspicious Activity Monitoring and Reporting at Broker-Dealers

SEC Highlights Compliance Issues Related to Suspicious Activity Monitoring and Reporting at Broker-Dealers

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

On March 29, 2021, the Securities and Exchange’s Commission Division of Examinations (“EXAMS”) issued a Risk Alert seeking to remind firms of their obligations under AML rules, and assist broker-dealers in enhancing their AML programs. Broker-dealers are regulated by the Bank Secrecy Act, which establishes a basic framework for AML obligations (the “AML Program Rule”), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which requires broker-dealers to comply with the reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act.

Broker-dealers are required under the AML Program Rule to maintain policies and procedures related to identifying and reporting suspicious activity. These policies and procedures should be tailored to the firm’s business and account for potential “red flag” activities in order for firm personnel to identify and respond to red flag activities. Broker-dealers are also required to file reports with FinCEN on any transactions involving funds that appear to be suspicious or illegal (the “SAR Rule”). Firms are expected to conduct due diligence in order to determine whether to file a SAR on any transactions that the firm “knows, suspects or has reason to suspect” is problematic.

EXAMS staff has made several observations related to the monitoring and reporting of suspicious activity. Some deficiencies in AML policies and procedures and other internal controls include:

  • Lack of or insufficient “red flags” policies, or policies that were not tailored to the firm’s practices;
  • Failure to establish automated systems to monitor for suspicious behavior associated with large trading volumes;
  • Failure to adequately monitor transactions for securities priced between $1 and $5 per share, considered to be high-risk “penny stocks”;
  • Setting the SAR reporting threshold at an amount higher than the required $5,000 threshold specified in the rule, thus failing to identify suspicious transactions; or
  • Firms inappropriately deferring to clearing firms to identify or report suspicious transactions.

EXAMS also observed that, by failing to adequately implement AML procedures, firms did not:

  • File SARs for transactions that appeared identical to transactions for which the firm would routinely file SARS without distinguishing the transactions from those on which SARs were filed previously;
  • Use available reports to monitor for suspicious activity;
  • Follow up on identified red flags; or
  • Comply with firm prohibitions on low-priced trades and not conducting due diligence on whether to file SARS on those transactions.

EXAMS made the following observations related to monitoring and reporting suspicious activity:

  • Firms often had weak policies and procedures, or failed to implement policies and procedures, that resulted in firms not conducting the proper due diligence or following up on known indicators of suspicious activity as highlighted in a previous EXAM risk alert regarding microcap securities. This led to the failure to file SARS for transactions that should have obviously been reported, such as, for example, “pump and dump” schemes.
  • Firms were not able to reasonably account for information that is publicly available, or in the firm’s possession when evaluating account activity.
  • Firms, in some cases, did not include accurate or complete details on suspicious transactions, or otherwise used insufficient boilerplate language on numerous filed SARS. Some examples include:
    • Not including key information despite having that information available in the firm’s internal records;
    • Recording the deposit of low-priced securities, but not the sale of the same securities shortly thereafter; or
    • For cyber-intrusions, not including details known at the time of reporting regarding the method and manner of the intrusion.

In conclusion, broker-dealers, or advisers that manage mutual funds, have an obligation as front-line participants to identify and address suspicious behavior. Greyline can assist with a review of your firm’s AML policies and procedures in light of this risk alert.

The full risk alert is available at SEC.gov.

Related Posts

JP Gonzalez

Partner
JP Gonzalez is a Partner at Greyline and heads the company’s technology and sales initiatives globally. He is also a member of gVue’s steering committee. Prior to joining Greyline, JP spent six years designing and evangelizing Compliance Regulatory Technology for broker-dealers, investment advisors and fund managers, where he assisted clients with all aspects of complying with FINRA, SEC and state rules and regulations related to a firm’s code of ethics. His technology background includes five years as a software developer and program manager at Microsoft, with his last two years at Microsoft as the UX/UI usability and accessibility program manager for Internet Explorer. He has a B.S. in Computer Science from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.

Nick Thomas

Partner
Nick Thomas is a Partner at Greyline and oversees the London office, which provides compliance support to U.K.-based hedge funds, private equity firms and other alternative asset managers. Prior to joining Greyline, Nick spent 13 years at the Financial Conduct Authority, the U.K. regulator, followed by three years at a well-known international compliance consultancy. During this time, he gained a broad and deep understanding of the U.K. regulatory environment applicable to alternative asset managers – both from the perspective of the regulator and the firms being regulated. His time at the FCA included working as a supervisor on the alternative investments team, with responsibility for supervising some of the largest and most prominent hedge funds in the U.K., and undertaking firm examinations across a broader population of alternative asset managers. Prior to this, he worked extensively on AIFMD implementation from the FCA’s perspective, as well as assessing applications from investment firms seeking to obtain FCA authorization. Nick obtained a BSc in Mathematics from Imperial College London. In addition, he holds the Investment Management Certificate (IMC), the Fundamentals of Alternative Investments Certificate and the Financial Planning Certificate (FPC). He also speaks Japanese.

Tim Goodwin

Partner
Tim Goodwin is a Partner at Greyline and the head of the Fort Worth office. Prior to joining Greyline, Tim spent two years providing ongoing compliance and consulting services to alternative asset managers, including private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds and hedge funds. He worked at TPG Capital for seven years in compliance and internal audit positions. As a director in the risk management and internal audit department, Tim was responsible for documenting and testing TPG’s allocation of fees and expenses, as well as preparing the firm for possible public listing, by leading TPG’s efforts in Sarbanes Oxley testing and compliance. Before joining the internal audit team, he spent five years running TPG’s compliance testing efforts across all of TPG’s businesses, including the private equity funds, credit platform, hedge funds, a 40 Act fund and a registered broker dealer. Prior to joining TPG Capital and moving to Texas, Tim spent more than six years with UBS Wealth Management (New York and New Jersey) in various compliance roles, touching on investment company, investment adviser and broker dealer compliance. He was most recently the chief compliance officer to UBS’s unit investment trusts and a compliance director for advisory products, including the separately managed account, financial advisor discretionary and mutual fund wrap programs. He assisted UBS in its first ever required annual reviews conducted pursuant to the compliance program rule, helped design and implement compliance policies and procedures for UBS’s advisory programs, and routinely assisted in updating required disclosure documents, including the Form ADV.

Jennifer Dickinson

Partner
Jennifer Dickinson is a Partner at Greyline and heads the firm’s Chicago office, as well as its CFTC/NFA practice. Her clients include private fund managers (hedge, private equity, venture capital and real estate), traditional RIAs, CPOs, CTAs and Swap Dealers. Jennifer advises on a range of compliance matters, including code of ethics/insider trading issues, risk management, compliance training, conflicts of interest and regulatory examinations. Prior to joining Greyline, Jennifer was the managing director of Sansome Strategies, a boutique compliance consulting firm specializing in alternative asset managers. Her other consulting experience includes serving as chief compliance officer for three prominent, SEC-registered investment advisers. Jennifer has also worked at noted law firms in the financial services space, including Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP. Jennifer began her career as the legal and compliance administrator at Standard Pacific Capital LLC, a SEC-registered, multi-strategy hedge fund manager based in San Francisco. Jennifer has an undergraduate degree from DePauw University and a law degree from Golden Gate University School of Law, where she was the editor–in–chief of the Law Review.

Sean Wilke

Partner & Head of Strategic Growth
Sean Wilke is a Partner, and the Head of Strategic Growth at Greyline and its affiliate GCM Advisory, which specialize in compliance consulting and outsourced finance, accounting and operations. He has extensive experience advising various types of investment managers, including hedge funds, private equity/credit funds, wealth managers, registered investment companies, institutional allocators and family offices, on a range of regulatory, compliance, operational and management matters. Before joining Greyline, Sean was a director within the governance, risk, investigations and disputes group at Duff & Phelps, where he focused on compliance and regulatory consulting for the alternative investment space. Prior to that, he was the general counsel and chief compliance officer of Bramshill Investments, a $4 billion, multi-strategy investment manager, where he oversaw all legal and compliance affairs. Sean also spent four years as a corporate and securities attorney at a law firm, as well as three years as a compliance associate at Bear Stearns & Co., where he performed surveillance for the investment and merchant banking groups. Sean has a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and a J.D. from New York Law School.

Kathy Malone

Partner & Head of Consulting
Kathy Malone is a Partner at Greyline and co-head of the firm’s New York office. Before joining Greyline, she was an examiner with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations in the Boston and New York offices, where she participated in numerous investment adviser and broker-dealer examinations. Prior to her time with the SEC, she was an examiner with FINRA, completing many examinations of broker-dealers and enforcement referrals. Most recently, Kathy worked for a consulting firm where she assisted broker-dealers, investment advisers and investment companies with the registration process, examination support and ongoing compliance needs. She has a B.S. in Finance from Villanova University and a Juris Doctor from Seton Hall Law.

Talia Brandt

Partner & Chief Operating Officer
Talia Brandt is a Partner at Greyline, and a member of gVue’s steering committee. Her team from Vista Compliance, LLC joined Greyline in May 2017. Talia founded Vista Compliance — a compliance consulting firm servicing broker-dealers, registered investment advisors and private fund managers — in April 2008. In her role with Greyline, Talia works closely with firms to ensure compliance with FINRA, state and SEC regulations. She has developed and implemented compliance and financial policies and procedures to ensure solid internal controls are in place for varying financial services firms. In addition to her compliance consulting work, Talia has served internally to firms as chief compliance officer and holds FINRA Series 7, 24, 66 and 79 registrations. Prior to forming Vista Compliance, Talia worked at Goldman Sachs in the investment management division in Salt Lake City. She then moved to the Bay area, where she went to work with smaller startup, boutique financial services firms.

Matt Okolita

Managing Partner

Matt Okolita is Managing Partner of Greyline, and a member of gVue’s steering committee. He has extensive SEC, FINRA and CFTC experience, having worked for and with premier hedge funds, private equity and venture capital firms, CLO and other debt managers, business development companies and mutual fund managers in both legal and compliance roles. Matt’s background includes undertaking a variety of legal and compliance functions, serving as counsel and chief compliance officer for startup managers, as well as international asset managers managing more than $30 billion. Matt has a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Economics from Bucknell University and a Juris Doctor from Suffolk University Law School, with distinction in Business Law and Financial Services.